There have been many changes in sales outreach over the last few years. One of the biggest challenges is the overflooding of inboxes. Why is this happening? Well, because outbound outreach brings benefits that many other channels can’t.
A direct line to your ICP where, if you close, you have much better control of the deal size. ROI in outreach still beats every other marketing channel.
The problem is that everyone now knows this, and buyers’ inboxes are getting flooded. So many have decided that the best approach is to just process large amounts of leads through sequence automation and be happy with getting just a few closes. Not an efficient way to go about it, but there it is. What is worse is that there are AI companies saying that their AI SDR will get you more meetings, but in reality, it is processing even more leads to get a few. It’s hard enough as a human to gain trust from a buyer, so suddenly the buyer who does not want to communicate with a bot will be happy to buy from a bot? Let’s leave that there for now.
The point is that there are lots of emails hitting every buyer’s inbox. So is it realistic to get meetings using only email? Yes, but. What’s the but? If your product is unique, you are a major recognizable name that solves a major problem. Of course.
But if you are not in that category, then you will have to consider all options. In reality, when you think about it, multichannel has lots of benefits. The decision makers already know everyone selling wants to talk to them. So when you call, it’s not news. It may feel momentarily annoying if they’re busy, but they know.
I have read some very thoughtful approaches. I am not saying that I agree with all of them, but I recently saw one that started with “save a puppy by reading this.” I can’t agree with all that, but what is good about being human is that we are creative.
Reaching out to a prospect through LinkedIn, phone calls, and email is not only the most effective way, but it also gives you a better chance because, you know what, it proves you are human and trying to make things happen. It’s more effective because you can keep control of the process, and every touchpoint is a channel that can get a response.
Email only limits you to five or six emails before you are pestering. You can still have those, but you add three calls and one LinkedIn connect request with a message that, if accepted, you send a second message. Now that adds up to about 11 touches. The math alone increases the odds.
It comes down to this. If you try, you may get it. If you don’t, you will definitely not get it.
If you want to win, you need to do whatever it takes unless it’s illegal. When I was starting out, I wanted an opportunity that I was not getting a response for. So I went to the decision maker’s office and sat there for three consecutive days, watching him come out of his office and walk by, looking at me and wondering who I was. After three days, he agreed to speak to me, and I got the job. Similar to how Bud Fox got Gordon Gekko cigars for his birthday and landed a meeting in the movie Wall Street. You just have to be relentless.
Sometimes you will run into a company that may not appreciate your service or product. If, once you have your shot, they don’t see it, move to the next one. Nothing wrong with that. It’s part of the nature of sales. In a digital world, if you want to sell, use every tool in your box, bar none. Anything less is shortchanging yourself.
So what do the numbers actually say?
I’ve made the case from experience, but let’s look at what the data tells us. Because while gut instinct matters in sales, the numbers don’t lie, and right now they are screaming one thing. Email only outreach is not enough to get the best results.
Recent prospecting reports show that email only campaigns are generating almost 30% fewer leads year on year. Think about that for a second. If you ran the same email only playbook last year and got 10 meetings, this year you are looking at 7. Next year, probably less. The channel is not broken, but when used alone it is becoming significantly less effective every quarter.
Recent benchmark studies put average cold email reply rates roughly in the 2% to 5% range, with positive reply rates often closer to 1% to 2%. Either way, a large percentage of cold emails you send get completely ignored. That is the reality of email only outreach in 2026.
Now compare that with multichannel. Sequences that use three or more channels, typically email, phone, and LinkedIn, deliver 287% higher response rates compared to single channel outreach. That number comes up repeatedly across multiple studies and data sets. It is not a marginal improvement. It is nearly quadruple the results.
Breaking it down by channel combination, the data gets even more interesting. Adding phone follow ups to email campaigns produces about a 128% increase in engagement compared to email alone. Combining email with LinkedIn outreach can push combined reply rates to around 15%, versus the 2% to 5% you get from email on its own. That is a three to five times improvement just by adding one more channel.
Using multimedia presentations to introduce and nurture
There is another piece that is often overlooked, and that is how you present what you are selling once you get attention. Getting a reply is one thing. Moving someone forward is another.
This is where multimedia presentations come in. Instead of relying only on text, you can show your product, explain it clearly, and guide the prospect through what actually matters. A short video, supporting visuals, and a clear call to action can do more than multiple follow up emails trying to explain the same thing.
It also changes how you nurture. Rather than sending another email that looks like every other email in their inbox, you are giving them something they can engage with on their own time. They can watch, review, and come back to it. That keeps the conversation moving without adding friction.
It is also more controlled. You decide what they see, in what order, and what action they can take next. Whether that is booking a demo, filling out a form, or moving forward directly, the experience is structured instead of scattered.
In a multichannel approach, this becomes even more effective. Your email, call, or LinkedIn message is the entry point, but the multimedia presentation is what carries the conversation forward. It gives context, builds understanding, and makes it easier for the buyer to make a decision.
Why multichannel works from a buyer’s perspective
The reason this works is not complicated when you think about it from the buyer’s side. B2B buyers now use an average of 10 or more interaction channels throughout their decision making process. They are on email, LinkedIn, taking calls, reading content, attending webinars, and comparing vendors on review sites. If you only show up in one of those places, you are invisible in the other nine.
Here is something that might surprise you. Despite all the talk about buyers wanting to be left alone, 80% of B2B buyers actually want to hear from sellers during their decision making process. The caveat is they want relevant, valuable outreach, not spam. And 73% of B2B buyers actively avoid suppliers who send irrelevant outreach. So the issue was never that buyers don’t want to be contacted. The issue is that most outreach is lazy, generic, and arrives through a single overloaded channel.
What multichannel does is solve both problems. It increases your chances of reaching someone through their preferred channel, and by showing up in multiple places with a consistent message, you build familiarity. You go from being a random cold email in a sea of hundreds to being that person who also connected on LinkedIn and left a thoughtful voicemail. That is how trust begins to form.
The follow up factor
One of the most overlooked aspects of outreach is follow up persistence. The data here is staggering. Roughly 55% of all replies come from follow up messages, not the initial email. Yet nearly half of all reps never send a second message. They are literally leaving more than half of their potential responses on the table.
Using three messages in a sequence instead of one increases total replies by over 100%. And this is where multichannel adds even more leverage. When your follow ups happen across different channels, each one feels distinct rather than repetitive. A LinkedIn connection request a day or two after an email feels like a natural next step. A phone call referencing the email you sent creates context and shows effort. Each channel reinforces the others instead of just adding noise to the same inbox.
A note on LinkedIn automation
LinkedIn is an important channel in multichannel outreach, but there is something that needs to be clearly understood. LinkedIn’s terms of service does not allow automation.
That means automated connection requests, automated messages, and most scraping or bot driven activity are against their rules. While many tools exist that attempt to automate LinkedIn outreach, using them carries risk, including account restrictions or a permanent ban.
If you are going to use LinkedIn as part of your outreach strategy, it should be done manually. That does not mean it cannot be efficient. It just means it needs to be human. Thoughtful connection requests, relevant messages, and real engagement.
The best way to handle this is to include LinkedIn as a manual task within your sequence. For example, after an email step, you add a task to send a connection request. If they accept, you follow up with a message. This keeps your outreach structured while staying compliant with LinkedIn’s rules.
This also aligns with what is already working. Buyers are pushing back on automation and responding better to real interaction. LinkedIn works best when it is used the way it was intended, as a professional network where real people communicate with each other.
The human element matters more than ever
Here is an interesting development. Gartner predicted that by 2030, 75% of B2B buyers will prefer sales experiences that prioritize human interaction over AI. After years of everything trending toward digital first and self-service, there is now a clear reversal happening. Buyers are starting to push back against fully automated, AI driven outreach and are expressing a desire for authentic human engagement, especially in complex or high stakes transactions. This makes sense, as sales are driven by relationships, and no one likes to buy from someone they don’t like.
This is exactly why multichannel outreach done by a real person is more valuable than ever. When you pick up the phone and have a genuine conversation with a prospect, when you send a thoughtful LinkedIn message that references something specific about their business, and when your email follow up builds on a real interaction rather than being another AI generated template, you are doing something that no automated system can replicate. AI is there to make things easier and more efficient, but it works for you, not the other way around.
Cold calling success rates actually doubled to around 4.82% in 2024 when combined with multichannel sequences. And 82% of buyers will accept meetings from what they consider strategic cold calls. The phone is not dead. It just works best when it is part of a coordinated multichannel approach rather than used in isolation.
The bottom line
The math is simple. Email only outreach gives you a 2% to 5% reply rate, with lower positive reply rates. Multichannel sequences using email, phone, and LinkedIn deliver roughly 287% more responses. Organizations with strong multichannel engagement retain 89% of their customers, compared to just 33% for those with weak channel integration. Companies running robust multichannel strategies see revenue growth up to 3.5 times faster than those without.
You can choose to keep sending emails and hope for the best. Or you can do what the data clearly shows works. Pick up the phone. Send the LinkedIn request. Write the email. Show up in every channel your buyer uses and do it with relevance, persistence, and the kind of human effort that proves you actually care about solving their problem.
Sales has always rewarded the people willing to do more than the minimum. The only thing that has changed is we now have the data to prove it.
0 Comments